City of Greenville City Council met Sept. 12.
Here are the minutes provided by the council:
The Regular Council meeting was called to order on September 12, 2023 at 7:00 PM by Mayor George Barber.
1. ROLL CALL
Council Present: Mayor George Barber, Council Member Ivan Estevez, Council Member Kyle Littlefield, and Council Member Blake Knox
Council Absent: Council Member Lisa Stephens
Staff Present: Finance Director Michelle Liggett, Attorney Patrick Schaufelberger, City Clerk Jody Weiss, Public Works Director George Schofield, Code Enforcement Officer Jeff Ketten, Chief Stefan Neece, Economic Development Director Bill Walker, City Manager Jo Hollenkamp via phone
Public Present: Sarah Cook, Jason Prichard, Holland Anthony, Rebecca Sponsler, Matt Obermark, Chris Dussold, Rex Gower, Jane Nelson, Breck Nelson, Rosie Baker, Sarah Littlefield, Jake Zambaldi, Walt Barenfanger,
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. CITIZEN INPUT / COMMENTS ON ANY AGENDA ITEM OR OTHERWISE
A letter was read from Mark Sargis by Councilman Kyle Littlefield:
Dear Mayor and City Council members,
I cannot attend tonight's City Council meeting but I would ask that you read this email as my comment during the public comment period.
At the start of my comments and questions during the recent public hearing on the proposed Business District, I said up front I am in favor of this kind of economic development tool. But I also said this tool, like any in the toolbox, should be used wisely and planned out well. Good planning includes good communication. This responsibility for good communication rests primarily with the city, especially when proposing to implement a tax or other plan affecting many in the community. So I was concerned when I had asked several business owners I knew if they had heard about the proposal and the public hearing, and they said no. Yes, many knew about the public hearing but apparently many did not. So, despite what a few Council members assumed when they called me following the public hearing, I was NOT going around getting business owners to oppose the Business District, and I had nothing to do with opposition flyers. My interest was in wanting to know if affected business owners were adequately informed and, if not, why not.
At least two City Council members shared my concern, telling me if it had been their choice, they would have "over-communicated" the messaging about the Business District proposal, or done more outreach to business owners than is legally required. In fact, I believe it is your ability to make that happen, since the Council gives policy direction and conveys expectations to staff for implementation. I hope there are more than two on the Council who favor that kind of openness. The City already does more than is legally required in some ways - such as continuing to broadcast and record City Council meetings for viewing live or later. Early on, the City Manager also subscribed Greenville to the Civic Web Portal where, with certain exceptions, the entire Council packet is posted prior to every meeting, not simply a 1 or 2 page agenda. These are among best practices, creating more opportunities for citizens to participate in local government.
Even when the City started efforts on a Downtown Strategic Plan (which is currently on hold without much explanation for the delay), City staff held a few public meetings to get input. So why not have scheduled a few informal public meetings to inform stakeholders about details of the Business District proposal, get valuable input, and gain some traction with the existing business community? You can say business owners should follow more closely what the City is doing and posting online, etc. But I submit the responsibility to communicate effectively rests with local government, and there is no good reason not to do it.
The point is not to try to please everyone in implementing this business district. The important points are to respect the current business owners enough to do effective outreach and, in the process, address concerns they naturally might have and get ideas for an even better plan. When I asked the City Manager at the July 25 Chamber "New Faces" meeting what feedback the City was getting so far about the proposed Business District, I was astonished to hear that staff had not spoken to businesses yet, explaining "that's what the public hearing is for," and that “it's much easier to talk to a group of people” than to individuals. However, it should not be surprising to anyone that if local government proposes something at all controversial, such as a taxing district that business owners pushed back against 10 years ago, you will gain much more support, or at least a lot less opposition, if you reach out to significant stakeholders well in advance of a public hearing. People want to be heard – and they might even have good ideas to make a plan better overall.
Some of you said you’re surprised you didn’t hear from more constituents in response to the Business District proposal. Perhaps that's because it was not "marketed" to the business community and so not enough business owners really knew about it to express opinions or offer suggestions. So I urge you not to put the burden on business owners to keep up with everything the City is doing. Do the hard but important work of reaching out to key stakeholders. Even mailing out a notice is effective and does not cost very much for the benefit you will gain. Those who are affected will appreciate your efforts much more than if you just do what’s “legally required.”
Finally, for a separate item on your agenda tonight, I have a suggestion concerning the proposal to amend the zoning ordinance to allow alcohol in the Downtown district without requiring food to be 51% or more of total sales. The proposal is to make bars, taverns and night clubs "permitted uses" in the district. Did you know there is no other zoning district where bars, taverns, and night clubs are a "permitted use"? They are only allowed as a Conditional Use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) and Commercial General (CG) districts. Similarly, beer, wine and liquor stores (for off-premises consumption of alcohol) are listed as a Conditional Use only in the CN and CG districts. I saw no discussion in either the staff memo or Planning Commission process distinguishing between Permitted and Conditional Uses, or suggesting the amendment for the Downtown district should be consistent with the other two districts allowing bars as a Conditional Use. One Council member I spoke to thought the amendment was supposed to be consistent with those other districts. From a planning standpoint, the City will greater control over what kind of "bars, taverns, and night clubs" come into the downtown area if you allow them as Conditional Uses, as in the other districts where those uses are allowed.
(NOTE: Bars are also listed as a Conditional Use and liquor stores as a Permitted Use in a zoning district called "Commercial Large-Scale" but, in fact, there is no such zoning district designated on the City's Zoning Map! I also found a few other, similar discrepancies in the Zoning Ordinance if you would like to hear about them.)
Thank you for your consideration.
Mark Sargis
4. COUNCIL OR MAYOR COMMENTS
4.1. Proclamation
Mayor Barber read the Proclamation for Greg Groves, which was presented on August 27 at Pastor Groves retirement reception.
4.2. Proclamation for Constitution Week September 17 - September 23
Mayor Barber presented Cindy Tischhauser, member of the Daughters of the American Revolution Chapter, a proclamation proclaiming September 17, 2023 through September 23, 2023 as Constitution Week.
5. ENGINEERING REPORT
5.1. HMG Report:
Beaumont Avenue Resurfacing
• The final project report was approved by IDOT on August 4th. This project has officially progressed to Phase II, which includes development of construction plans.
• Preliminary plans are currently being prepared and are on track to be submitted to IDOT this month for review.
Dewey Street
• Expected construction in FY 2025.
5.2. Milano & Grunloh Report:
Rex Gower went over the updates with the Council.
• Idler Lane Water Main Replacement Project. Any punch list items that come up will be addressed by the Contractor.
• SRTS Attached is a map of the application area. The City received $250,000. They recommended including Phase 2 in the ESR to help the project score higher when applying for funding. The bid letting was held on August 4, 2023. See the attached bid. The next round of Safe Route to School (SRTS) Grants are due October 2, 2023. See Exhibit 1. The City plans to apply for Phase 2. The public hearing was held on August 9th at 7:00 p.m. IDOT has awarded the project.
• The IEPA has funded the project in the amount of $21,404,770.96 at an interest rate of 0.93% with $1,250,000.00 in loan forgiveness. The city also applied for a DCEO RIPI grant which was announced and the City received a 2 million dollar grant. We have received the grant agreement, executed it and sent back to DCEO. See attached layout and bid tabulation. The City also received a state legislative grant from Rodney Davis which is being worked through. Bids were opened on May 5th. The bids were approximately 20% over budget. The City requested a loan of 22 million from the IEPA which was approved. The City awarded the All Service Contract for Filter Installation for $119,995.00 and Contract for Filter Supply for $2,043,820.00. All the paperwork with the IEPA is complete. The contract documents are complete. The pre-construction conference meeting was held on September 5th with construction planned to begin at the end of September.
When the award was completed, the ground storage tank was not awarded since funding with the Rodney Davis Grant was not finalized. This has been worked through and the ground storage tank is being added to Grunloh Building’s contract through a change order. Change Order #1 for an increase of $615,092.00 is attached for approval. This was done for funding purposes and not by any actions of Grunloh Building.
• DCEO Applications were due January 19th. DCEO has raised the grant ceiling to $1.5 million dollars for this year only. Attached is a project exhibit and budget. The application was submitted January 19th. The project was funded at $1.5 million. Engineering and administration contracts are presented for approval.
• ITEP – The application has been submitted. See the attached exhibit and estimate for the proposed project. Announcements were made and the City was not selected.
• OSLAD (Open Space Land Acquisition and Development) The application has been submitted. The City of Greenville is theoretically eligible for a 100% $600,000 grant. See the attachments. Applications will be accepted through August 31st. The City plans to reapply. The public hearing was held on August 9th and the application has been submitted.
• There has been severe erosion along Sunset Point. The possibility of filling in this area is being evaluated. MET completed a geotechnical analysis in May to evaluate filling the area. The field work has been completed and the report has been received. Preliminary plans are complete. The plan is to have a bid opening on October 5th at 10:00 a.m.
• Downtown Grant – The City received $1.9 million for these improvements. Milano & Grunloh will assist with Administration. The City is discussing possible changes from the original application. The City is still waiting on a grant agreement. The topographic survey has been completed.
• There are items at the Waste Water Treatment Plant that will need addressed in the next five years. These are being evaluated to develop a plan for a timeline and budget. One clarifier was taken offline and inspected. It was in good shape, but will need work completed or deterioration will escalate. The plan is to submit a funding application to the IEPA for a $3 million project. Preliminary, the City is eligible for 45% principal forgiveness. See the attached exhibit and plan. Milano & Grunloh has submitted the paperwork to the IEPA.
• Elm Street Overlay– This is to overlay Elm Street South of Route 40 and the parking lot at Summer Street and 2nd Street. Survey work is complete and plans are started.
• Anthony Supply Storm Sewer – This is an existing storm sewer under Anthony Supply that is failing. The project was awarded to Groundworks Contracting, Inc. at $85,595.00. The shop drawings are approved and contract documents are prepared. The contractor plans to begin this week.
• Source Water Protection Plan –This has been submitted and received by the IEPA.
• Bond Madison Interconnect – An interconnection with Bond/Madison is being completed. Preliminary plans are complete. Once finalized, plans and permits will be sent to the IEPA.
• Development on State Route 127 – There is a potential development along the state highway. A plat is being prepared to facilitate development.
• Completed Projects:
• Buzzard Bay Sidewalk
• Survey on Spring Street
• Easements for Lights on College Avenue
• Survey on Pecan Street
• Patio at 102 N Second Street
• School Streets
• Chemical Feed Modifications
6. CONSENT AGENDA
6.1. Minutes of:
A) Regular Council Meeting 08/08/2023
6.2. Financial Statements for August, 2022
6.3. Approval of Unpaid Bills
A) August bills
6.4. Administrative Reports
A) Police Department
B) Public Works Department
C) Sewer Department
D) Water Department
E) Building Permits
F) Building Inspector/Code Enforcement
G) Record - None
6.5. Other Items:
A) Appoint Gary Zurliene to Lake Committee
B) Appointment of Richard Franks and Amanda O'Regan to fill the vacant positions of Dale Martin and Curtis Flake to the Library Board of Directors; both terms to expire on April 30, 2025.
Motion to appoint Richard Franks and Amanda O'Regan to fill the vacant positions of Dale Martin and Curtis Flake to the Library Board of Directors; both terms to expire on April 30, 2025.
C) Airstravagaza Funding Request
Craig Baumberger of the Greenville Pilot's Association was present and said GPA wanted to originally do a 2 day event, it just was not feasible. Their request is for $750 for advertising and $500 to bring in a T6 World War II Trainer. Bill Walker stated that although this event was not budgeted, we do have money in the budget to accommodate.
Motion by Laura Wall, seconded by Jane Nelson, to grant Greenville Pilot's Association $1,250 for Airstravaganza
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Laura Wall
SECONDER: Jane Nelson
AYES: David Kessinger, Laura Wall, Om Jogi, Chintan Patel, and Jane Nelson
ABSENT: Erin Bradshaw, Kathy Brewer, and Sharon Grimes
D) Consideration of granting Bond County Humane Society $750 for Paws in the Park
Motion by David Kessinger, seconded by Om Jogi, to approve the $750 grant for Paws in the Park to benefit Bond County Humane Society.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: David Kessinger
SECONDER: Om Jogi
AYES: David Kessinger, Laura Wall, Om Jogi, Chintan Patel, and Jane Nelson
ABSENT: Erin Bradshaw, Kathy Brewer, and Sharon Grimes
E) Consideration to grant Hill's Fort Society $1,000 for the Hill's Fort Rendezvous being held September 15-17.
Motion by Laura Wall, seconded by Jane Nelson, to approve the $1,000 Tourism grant to the Hill's Fort Rendezvous.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Laura Wall
SECONDER: Jane Nelson
AYES: David Kessinger, Laura Wall, Om Jogi, Chintan Patel, and Jane Nelson
ABSENT: Erin Bradshaw, Kathy Brewer, and Sharon Grimes
F) HPOCA Winter National Get-Together Funding Request
This event will fill the hotels at a slow time of the year. Om Jogi said the last time American Farm Heritage Museum hosted this event in 2015 he was at or near capacity at his hotel and the attendees really enjoyed being in Greenville.
Motion by Om Jogi, seconded by Jane Nelson, to grant $2,100 to the HPOCA Winter National Get-Together
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Om Jogi
SECONDER: Jane Nelson
AYES: David Kessinger, Laura Wall, Om Jogi, Chintan Patel, and Jane Nelson
ABSENT: Erin Bradshaw, Kathy Brewer, and Sharon Grimes
6.6. Approval of consent items
Approval of consent agenda items (<--this text will not show on output document; motion/recommendation will show)
Motion by Ivan Estevez, seconded by Blake Knox, Motion to approve Consent Items 6.1 - 6.6.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Ivan Estevez
SECONDER: Blake Knox
AYES: George Barber, Ivan Estevez, Kyle Littlefield, and Blake Knox
ABSENT: Lisa Stephens
7. MATTERS OF COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
7.1. Consideration of Change Order #1 for the Water Treatment Plant.
When the award was completed, the ground storage tank was not awarded since funding with the Rodney Davis Grant was not finalized. This has been worked through and the ground storage tank is being added to Grunloh Building’s contract through a change order. Change Order #1 for an increase of $615,092.00 is attached for approval. This was done for funding purposes and not by any actions of Grunloh Building.
Motion by Kyle Littlefield, seconded by Ivan Estevez, Motion to accept change order #1 for $615,092 for the ground storage tank for the new water treatment plant.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Kyle Littlefield
SECONDER: Ivan Estevez
AYES: George Barber, Ivan Estevez, Kyle Littlefield, and Blake Knox
ABSENT: Lisa Stephens
7.2. Consideration to purchase a 9 month CD from The FNB Community Bank for $1,000,000 out of the general fund, Note: Current fund balance in the general account is $ 4 million so by purchasing the one CD we will still have approximately $3 million for cash flow. Note: This has also been approved by the auditors. Motion by Blake Knox, seconded by Kyle Littlefield, Motion to purchase a 9 month CD from The FNB Community Bank in the amount of $1,000,000.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Blake Knox
SECONDER: Kyle Littlefield
AYES: George Barber, Ivan Estevez, Kyle Littlefield, and Blake Knox
ABSENT: Lisa Stephens
7.3. Consideration of Ordinance establishing Solar guidelines and fees. Motion by Kyle Littlefield, seconded by Ivan Estevez, Motion to approve the ordinance establishing solar guidelines and fees.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Kyle Littlefield
SECONDER: Ivan Estevez
AYES: George Barber, Ivan Estevez, Kyle Littlefield, and Blake Knox
ABSENT: Lisa Stephens
7.4. PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 6:04 PM: A request from the City of Greenville to amend the Use Matrix, Table 153.0202(A) of the Unified Development Code, to make bars, taverns, and nightclubs a Permitted Use in the (D) Downtown zoning district.
Bill Johnston asked about the verbiage "nightclub". It was explained that is just terminology from the UDC Code. Definition is any business that sells less than 51% food and more alcohol. Johnston was concerned this seemed to come up very fast. City Manager Hollenkamp said this was noticed in the Advocate for the required 15 days, on our website, and also posted at the Municipal Building.
City Manager Hollenkamp explained there is a business who wants to purchase Watson's and turn into a sports bar with 51% sales in food, along with 2nd floor luxury apartments and in the basement a bar. There would be 3 levels, and outside seating would also be available. She added that atmosphere and administration has changed and this code has been a stumbling block to bringing in businesses. She also noted that there is a pub that could possibly be located in the downtown zone, but not directly on the square.
Chance Vohlken read an emailed statement from Kayla Curry: "...I am writing this email to voice my support to allow bars, taverns and nightclubs in the downtown zoning districts. Nobody is forcing someone to go to a bar, tavern or nightclub downtown if they don't want to, but allowing them the option shouldn't be discouraged."
Vohlken also read this emailed statement from John Gillard: "Be careful what you wish for. I personally think it would be nice to have a place to eat like maybe a sports bar or pub and grill. Would you also be happy with a marijuana dispensary, tattoo parlor which seems to be very popular around younger people or maybe some type of gaming venue? I will not be at the meeting tonight because of a prior commitment."
Vohlken then read an emailed statement from Heather Edwards: "Thank you for giving me an opportunity to be heard even though I cannot attend. As someone who has lived here 15 years and has owned a business for 19 and now owns property on the square, I'm very invested in this community. I believe the laws need to change to allow for an establishment to open. Many years ago we had an interest in opening a brewpub, but we stopped once we learned of the rules surrounding liquor.
Our community needs to grow. Young and middle aged folks want to go out and meet friends, or have a date night. We cannot attract businesses if they have looming liquor laws that make it difficult for them.
I'd like you to consider changing this to make Greenville grow and be a place people come to and get our square alive again."
JoEllen Vohlken said Greenville needs a change. We need to have something people will stay in town for. She understands people are concerned with peoples actions under the influence, but FourthFest has proved that people can control themselves. She added the City needs to move forward with the times.
PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED AT 6:15 PM
Chance Vohlken has supported this idea for a long time. He feels the public can handle themselves. He suggested the police department drive by the square a few more times if needed. He added that there is an establishment serving alcohol 20 miles in any cardinal direction of Greenville, and they have a lively downtown that is inviting and people want to stay for a while. Other businesses in their downtowns are thriving as well. He felt we need to do what we can to entice people to come to Greenville.
Brent Shaw asked about neon signs in the windows. Jack Chism said we have sign ordinances that would solve that issue.
Dennis Warren said the school district has done their part in bringing high quality facilities for the sports teams, and Greenville should do their part for the adults in the area.
Janie Nelson did not like the verbiage, but that is just a "category" in the UDC.
C Vohlken added that in order for someone to get a liquor license, they must go in front of the City Council for approval.
Jack Chism said Greenville used to be a dry town and a safe place to be. This is not a brand new idea. The horse has left the barn. Do we have the citizens demand another referendum to allow this? Continuing, Chism said he still feels safe and the liquor sales did not change his feelings of safeness. He said maybe it is not plausible to stay away from these kind of establishments.
Motion by Ivan Estevez, seconded by Kyle Littlefield, Motion to approve ordinance to amend the Use Matrix, Table 153.0202(A) of the Unified Development Code, to make bars, taverns, and nightclubs a Permitted Use in the (D) Downtown zoning district.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Ivan Estevez
SECONDER: Kyle Littlefield
AYES: George Barber, Ivan Estevez, Kyle Littlefield, and Blake Knox
ABSENT: Lisa Stephens
Littlefield was concerned about having the Downtown district having a Permitted Use rather than Conditional Use and asked if there was a difference in timing. Jeff Ketten said the timeline from start to finish usually takes 2-3 months due to having to get a quorum for the Planning Commission, a 15 day legal notice, and then going to the next City Council Meeting, whereas if the use is Permitted, it would go straight in front of the City Council. The Council will still have to approve the liquor license, so bars will not show up without council knowledge or approval in the district. Littlefield would like the other districts that are currently Conditional Use to then be designated as Permitted Use to stay consistent.
Estevez stated we are not looking to put in nightclubs in the area. He wants the City to grow and now is the time.
Littlefield added that Lisa Stephens, who was absent due to illness, was fully in favor of this ordinance.
7.5. Consideration of Ordinance concerning the keeping chickens within the city limits.
Littlefield said he has fielded concerns from both sides, with complaints being about noise being a nuisance, however he has driven around areas with chickens at different points of the day and has not heard anything other than cicadas and dogs barking. He also stated that chickens are usually bought in lots of 6, so limiting to only 6 would mean all of the chickens would have to die before they could get new ones. He went on to say there were concerns about the setbacks, as some properties simply just do not have enough room. He felt the 4 square feet cage per chicken was in line with the recommendation, except for Bantam chickens, who only require 2 square feet cage. He then asked why not have a free permit, just like the Burn Permits.
Littlefield suggested the limit of chickens be increased to 9, and the council decided to amend the proposed ordinance to 10 chickens with those residents who have more grandfathered in at this time. If the resident's currently have more chickens, as they die the resident will need to get the number of chickens to 10 by attrition.
Knox said the original concern was from a neighbor of a chicken owner who was not cleaning their coops and runs properly. It was creating quite a mess and smell, not to mention the neighbor's dog getting into the mess.
Littlefield asked about reducing the setbacks, and it was agreed upon to grandfather in current chicken owners, keeping the legal non-comforming use in place. Code Enforcement Officer Jeff Ketten said the setbacks are in line with the code. Folks should not have chickens if they do not have enough room for them.
Sarah Cook, a resident of Greenville, said she grew up with chickens and between the heat and the feces the smell is terrible.
Rosie Baker, a chicken owner and also a resident of Greenville, said her chickens have plenty of room to run. Her coops and runs are about 4 feet within the property line. When deciding to get chickens, they consulted with their neighbors to make sure it was ok with them. She went on to say they keep their pens clean and have had no issues with smells or neighbors complaining. Estevez said the main thing is to keep the pens and coops clean.
It was decided to amend the proposed ordinance to grandfather in those who already have pens and coops to keep where they are located on the property, and the setbacks will be enforced going forward as permits are purchased.
Another amendment for the proposed ordinance is to allow 2 square feet per Bantam Chickens, as opposed to 4 square feet for regular chickens.
Motion by Kyle Littlefield, seconded by Blake Knox, Motion to approve Ordinance concerning the keeping chickens within the city limits.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Kyle Littlefield
SECONDER: Blake Knox
AYES: George Barber, Ivan Estevez, Kyle Littlefield, and Blake Knox
ABSENT: Lisa Stephens
7.6. Consideration of an ordinance establishing the Greenville Business District; approving a Business District Plan' authorizing the imposition and collection of a sales tax within such Business District; and approving certain actions in connection with the establishment of such Business District.
Littlefield stated he felt adopting a Business District will enable us to bring more businesses, such as restaurants and shops, to Greenville. He also said he talked with Lisa Stephens and she is full support of the Business District.
Estevez added there are 102 counties in Illinois, and 48 have a Business District now. It is good for businesses. The town will die if we do not do something now, and this is way overdue.
Knox said people are asking for us to bring businesses in, and this is the way to do it.
Motion by Blake Knox, seconded by Ivan Estevez, Motion to approve an ordinance establishing the Greenville Business District; approving a Business District Plan' authorizing the imposition and collection of a sales tax within such Business District; and approving certain actions in connection with the establishment of such Business District.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Blake Knox
SECONDER: Ivan Estevez
AYES: George Barber, Ivan Estevez, Kyle Littlefield, and Blake Knox
ABSENT: Lisa Stephens
7.7. Go into executive session for personnel. Note: There will be no business after executive session and meeting will be adjourned from executive session.
Motion by Ivan Estevez, seconded by Kyle Littlefield, Motion to go into executive session per 5ILCS (C)(1) Personnel and 5ILCS(c)(5) Purchase of real estate at 8:05 PM.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Ivan Estevez
SECONDER: Kyle Littlefield
AYES: George Barber, Ivan Estevez, Kyle Littlefield, and Blake Knox
ABSENT: Lisa Stephens
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION
8.3. Adjournment
Motion by Ivan Estevez, seconded by Kyle Littlefield, made a motion to adjourn the Regular Council Meeting on September 12, 2023 at 9:25 PM.
RESULT: Carried
MOVER: Ivan Estevez
SECONDER: Kyle Littlefield
AYES: George Barber, Ivan Estevez, Kyle Littlefield, and Blake Knox
ABSENT: Lisa Stephens
https://greenvilleillinois.civicweb.net/document/22809/
Alerts Sign-up